Modi-Xi exchange in Kazan fires rise of multipolar world

India and China are set to mend ties, opening prospects of the rise of a post-West world order

Caption: Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi meets China’s President Xi Jinping in Kazan after a gap of five years

The BRICS summit in Kazan has yielded a major breakthrough. India and China, the two rising stars of a post-Covid world, decided to end their border tensions that had flared since April 2020.   

After a 5-year gap, the  two heavyweights of the multipolar world—Prime Minister Narendra Modi of India and China’s President Xi Jinping—had a pathbreaking face-to-face meeting at Russia’s fifth-largest city.  

It is not that the two leaders were unfamiliar with lengthy stand-alone conversations with each other. In April 2018, the pair had met for a two-day informal summit at Wuhan. The personal chemistry between the two then was palpable—visible in plain sight during the solo boat ride and relaxed walks they undertook along the shimmering East Lake. The Wuhan conversation was followed by another informal summit— this time in Mamallapuram, a heritage coastal town at a stone throw from Chennai, India’s bustling metropolis along  Bay of Bengal.

But the bonhomie between the two civilizational states was not to last long. In April 2020, military tensions between them surged, peaking in June when Indian and Chinese troops  clashed without firearms  on the banks of the freezing Galwan river in the high mountains of  Eastern Ladakh.  

But that dangerous crisis that pitted the two nuclear powers on a collision course was resolved only hours before Modi and Xi  met on the sidelines of the Kazan summit. Following the breakthrough that these talks yielded,  both leaders immediately instructed their close confidants--National Security Advisor Ajit Doval from India and foreign Minister Wang Yi from China—to discuss the nuts and bolts of disengagement and more. The choice of two principals was logical. Both Doval and Wang had already been appointed by the two leaders as their  Special Representative. Their task was do all the heavy lifting that would end the dispute along the 4000-kilometre Sino-Indian frontier.  

 Simultaneously, after the Kazan meeting,  personnel of the two foreign ministries have been asked to discuss other downstream concerns and avail possible game-changing opportunities that many believe are within grasp.  

Behind the scenes, Russia has stood tall as a well-meaning friend encouraging the  two Asian giants to talk. It may be recalled that in 2019, Russian President Vladimir Putin—the third leader who is part of the trilogy of statesmen rising from the multipolar crucible— had visited  New Delhi. During his conversation with Modi then, the Russian President showed his willingness to end the Xi-Modi estrangement. On his return  from the Indian capital, Putin spoke to the Chinese President. He then dialled Modi, apparently to convey the crux of his conversation with Xi.

In Kazan, the three leaders have been photographed together, opening speculation on whether the gates of a Russia-India-China (RIC) trilateral revival are slowly re-opening,  in tune with the dismantling of the old-world order where rules of engagement had only been written by the West.  

https://x.com/dhairyam14/status/1848936620591894986

If that happens, it would not be the first time the RIC leaders would be meeting. A dialogue between RIC foreign ministers has already been institutionalised. The first RIC summit had been held in 2019 on the sidelines of the Osaka G-20 summit.

Now, that the dust has settled on the Kazan conclave, what possible pathways has it opened that India and China can pursue?  

For starters the military disengagement process from the Line of Actual Control –the interim border between India and China in Eastern Ladakh has begun.

https://x.com/PoliticalQuestX/status/1851292973180563457

The BRICS summit in Kazan has yielded a major breakthrough. India and China, the two rising stars of a post-Covid world, decided to end their border tensions that had flared since April 2020.   

After a 5-year gap, the  two heavyweights of the multipolar world—Prime Minister Narendra Modi of India and China’s President Xi Jinping—had a pathbreaking face-to-face meeting at Russia’s fifth-largest city.  

It is not that the two leaders were unfamiliar with lengthy stand-alone conversations with each other. In April 2018, the pair had met for a two-day informal summit at Wuhan. The personal chemistry between the two then was palpable—visible in plain sight during the solo boat ride and relaxed walks they undertook along the shimmering East Lake. The Wuhan conversation was followed by another informal summit— this time in Mamallapuram, a heritage coastal town at a stone throw from Chennai, India’s bustling metropolis along  Bay of Bengal.

But the bonhomie between the two civilizational states was not to last long. In April 2020, military tensions between them surged, peaking in June when Indian and Chinese troops  clashed without firearms  on the banks of the freezing Galwan river in the high mountains of  Eastern Ladakh.  

But that dangerous crisis that pitted the two nuclear powers on a collision course was resolved only hours before Modi and Xi  met on the sidelines of the Kazan summit. Following the breakthrough that these talks yielded,  both leaders immediately instructed their close confidants--National Security Advisor Ajit Doval from India and foreign Minister Wang Yi from China—to discuss the nuts and bolts of disengagement and more. The choice of two principals was logical. Both Doval and Wang had already been appointed by the two leaders as their  Special Representative. Their task was do all the heavy lifting that would end the dispute along the 4000-kilometre Sino-Indian frontier.  

 Simultaneously, after the Kazan meeting,  personnel of the two foreign ministries have been asked to discuss other downstream concerns and avail possible game-changing opportunities that many believe are within grasp.  

Behind the scenes, Russia has stood tall as a well-meaning friend encouraging the  two Asian giants to talk. It may be recalled that in 2019, Russian President Vladimir Putin—the third leader who is part of the trilogy of statesmen rising from the multipolar crucible— had visited  New Delhi. During his conversation with Modi then, the Russian President showed his willingness to end the Xi-Modi estrangement. On his return  from the Indian capital, Putin spoke to the Chinese President. He then dialled Modi, apparently to convey the crux of his conversation with Xi.

In Kazan, the three leaders have been photographed together, opening speculation on whether the gates of a Russia-India-China (RIC) trilateral revival are slowly re-opening,  in tune with the dismantling of the old-world order where rules of engagement had only been written by the West.  

https://x.com/dhairyam14/status/1848936620591894986

If that happens, it would not be the first time the RIC leaders would be meeting. A dialogue between RIC foreign ministers has already been institutionalised. The first RIC summit had been held in 2019 on the sidelines of the Osaka G-20 summit.

http://www.xinhuanet.com/english/2019-06/28/c_138181891_2.htm

Now, that the dust has settled on the Kazan conclave, what possible pathways has it opened that India and China can pursue?  

For starters the military disengagement process from the Line of Actual Control –the interim border between India and China in Eastern Ladakh has begun.

https://x.com/PoliticalQuestX/status/1851292973180563457

That should mean greater stability along the borders. Negotiations leading to the recent breakthrough would have certainly revisited the various border peace agreements between India and China, triggered by the 1993 Peace and Tranquillity (P&T) Accord that the two had earlier signed. The P & T Accord of 1993 was the touchstone for a series of Confidence Building Measures CBMs), mechanisms and protocols to prevent an inadvertent clash at the borders. Following the Xi-Modi summit in Kazan, the sanctity of these foundational agreements would have been restored. Certainly, the primacy of these accords would be reinforced during the impending meeting of the two Special Representatives.

It is also likely that the restoration of the CBMs, triggered by the 1993 accord,  will open the door of a broader boundary settlement between India and China. Prime Minister Modi has already stated his intent to resolve the border row root and branch. It would not be surprising if Xi reciprocates. The window for such an opportuning in India has recently widened after recent American inroads in India and China’s South Asian neighbourhood. For instance, the recent regime change in Bangladesh choreographed by the US deep state poses a threat to both India and China. Besides, US inroads in neighbouring Myanmar, with intent of carving out an independent Zo state by cobbling together sovereign territories of India and Myanmar undermines Beijing or New Delhi’s core interests.

The American deep state’s interreference in India’s national elections, its decision to dock India for the killing of a Khalistan separatist in Canada has deeply soured New Delhi-Washington ties. Canada and US’ refusal to act against India’s foes brazenly operating in these closely knitted countries has not gone down well in Modi’s New India.  The common sentiment of disenchantment with the West is a factor that is likely to encourage  India and China, with caveats,  to rediscover each other along a novel strategic trajectory.  

Second, the Modi-Xi summit is likely to energise the India-China economic track. After the tepid success at forging alterative supply chains with the West in the aftermath of the Covid pandemic, and China’s in difficulties in sustaining its West-oriented export led growth, the stage appears set for a new round of economic engagement between India and China. From an Indian perspective, only sensitive technologies that can hamper national security will remain outside the ambit of extensive collaborations. India would also be wanting Chinese investment to rev up its startup ecosystem. Besides, it would  welcome Chinese investments in joint ventures, especially in the new economy based on the industry 4.0 template.

Third, in the new round of India-China engagement, India would be carefully fathoming whether China would de-hyphenate its relationship with New Delhi and Islamabad. In case China decides to support designation of key Pakistani nationals  in the UN Security Council as international terrorists, it would greatly help in reducing the existing trust deficit between New Delhi and Beijing.

Fourth, other factors that would determine the trajectory of India-China ties is the depth of the New Delhi-Washington relationship in the Indo-Pacific region.  If Beijing  is convinced that India is not backing a coalition for the containment of China in the Indo-Pacific, it will naturally encourage both countries to find common ground in the BRICS and Global South ecosystem. From an Indian perspective, there would be an expectation that China would avoid pressing on India’s sensitivities in its South Asian backyard, including Sri Lanka and Maldives.

While the breakthrough dialogue in Kazan is a great start, it must be followed by a pervasive dialogue so that all radials of a complex relationship can be developed and synced. In case India and China succeed in forging a first-rate bilateral relationship, it would go a long way in galvanising a multipolar world whose centre of gravity, breaking away from the West, would dock with an expanded BRICS, driving the new world order driven by the Global South.